14 Comments
User's avatar
B Squared's avatar

Russell 200 is more about exposure to growth vs. value -- diversification difference between 200 and 2000 is actually surprisingly very small. Russell 200 is available only as IWY - Russell 200 Growth - vs. Russell 2000. And if big tech stops outperforming, nothing says big non-tech will perform well.

Chris Beres's avatar

I don't know if the implication is that holding all of these in a portfolio is a good thing "now," but I would be careful about the Tech-heavy approach here. With SPY, QQQ, and URTH, you'd be looking at over a combined 30+% of the Mag 7. Lots of exposure there.

Guy's avatar

Great article, I would consider IEMG > EEM

Compounding Quality's avatar

Thanks for adding, Guy!

Patrick J Van Nimmen's avatar

People in Europe can buy a (US) ETF (without European passport) - only need to be considered professional/qualified investor. Couple of conditions to be accepted but not overly difficult at e.g. IBKR

Compounding Quality's avatar

Thanks for adding, Patrick!

Leopard's avatar

Excellent read and easily digestible! Also I learned a thing or two about the international ETF alternatives for our friends overseas. Thank you!

Compounding Quality's avatar

It's an honor, Leopard!

Patrick J Van Nimmen's avatar

Have we looked at that issue with the US estate tax for non-US residents? Upon your passing away, US brokers (such as IBKR) will block your account until you can prove that you have paid this US tax (becoming due when you have > 60k in US securities even if you do not have any other link to the US). I live in a country that has no estate tax and do not have any intention to pay this - unjustified - US estate tax. The US authorities do not even enforce this tax so that is not the problem but the US brokers blocking your account definitely is - they de facto make you pay this tax (btw 40% for amounts > 1M). I'm moving my portfolio away from IBKR (where I was quite happy) to a non-US broker.

Other people in same situation?

Compounding Quality's avatar

Hi Patrick,

Yes this is a risk (in theory). In practice most brokers don't apply it yet. I'm not sure whether you directly invest via IBKR or you use a Belgian broker. I would be very surprised if a Belgian broker applies this US estate tax

Patrick J Van Nimmen's avatar

I have done some digging and it is a very real risk if you use a US broker like IBKR (even if IBKR Ireland). They will not apply the tax but block your account until such time that you can provide a statement from the US that you "settled your estate tax bill". This will take >9months. Non-US brokers will typically not block your account. I just confirmed this with Saxobank and eToro. Not a clue about the Belgian brokers (I have Belgian nationality but left that place long ago). Thought I would share this since it could apply to a lot of the Members and noticed that you also use IBKR (as did/do I). It took a lot of time and effort making IBKR admit they block your account - understandable since would apply to all their non-US clients and can easily scare them away. Still, IBKR not mentioning this is quite disgusting.

B Squared's avatar

Three of them are inferior ETFs:

SPY - OEF (S&P 100) has meaningfully outperformed SPY over the long haul. And XLG (S&P 50) has crushed SPY. SPY is only preferable if you have millions in it, due to the capability it allows for with options income.

QQQ - Nope. QQQM is the same exact thing (Nasdaq 100) but is 5 bps cheaper.

Russell 2000 - Nope. Too much diversification. The Russell 200 Growth (IWY) has crushed it and will always crush it.

Best of all wasn’t even mentioned: SCHG.

Compounding Quality's avatar

Hi,

Thanks for adding!

SPY - OEF (S&P100): I guess this is a personal preference. When Big Tech would stop outperforming, the performance would be the other way around.

QQQ <-> QQQM: the liquidity is a lot lower for QQM

Russell 2000 <-> Russell 200: It depends on how much diversification you want :)